🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a pending law that include decreasing the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, global health authorities raised concerns that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of corporate influence everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “according to global suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

International experts in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, arguing that it would drive users to “black market” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

In the letter, the company executive of the African subsidiary says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We reside in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The company operates its operations according with applicable local laws. Further, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, they said, mentioning that minors should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to accomplish desired population health targets, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.